CFP for The Body and Pseudoscience in the Long Nineteenth Century Interdisciplinary Conference (Abstracts 31 January 2016, Conference 18 June 2016)


cropped-mesmer-group‘Sciences we now retrospectively regard as heterodox or marginal cannot be considered unambiguously to have held that status at a time when no clear orthodoxy existed that could confer that status upon them’ (Alison Winter, 1997). Proposals are sought for 20-minute papers for an interdisciplinary conference on pseudoscience in the nineteenth century, to be held at Newcastle University. For more information, visit the conference website.

The nineteenth century witnessed the drive to consolidate discrete scientific disciplines, many of which were concerned with the body. Attempts were made to clarify the boundaries between the ‘scientific’ and the ‘pseudoscientific’, between ‘insiders’ and ‘outsiders’. This conference asks what became lost in separating the orthodox from the heterodox. What happened to the systems of knowledge and practice relating to the body that were marginalised as ‘pseudoscience’? Was knowledge and insight into the human condition lost in the process? Or is it immortalised within the literature of ‘pseudoscience’?

This interdisciplinary conference considers how different discourses of the body were imagined and articulated across a range of visual and verbal texts (including journalism, fiction, popular science writing, illustration) in order to evaluate how ‘pseudoscience’ contributed both to understandings of the body and what it is to be human and to the formation of those disciplines now deemed orthodox.

Suggested topics include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Acting on the body – the body as a site of experimentation and scientific contestation
  • Pseudoscience and the gendered body
  • The entranced body as a conduit for knowledge of the self
  • The ‘scientifically’ prescribed body – an attempt to rationalise the irrational?
  • ‘Pseudoscience’ and the speculative nature of ‘science’
  • Scientific disciplines – a move towards self-authentication and professionalisation of a loss of universal truth?
  • Pseudoscience and abnormality
  • The discourse of gender in the seance room
  • Visual interpretations of the ‘pseudoscientific’
  • Victorian periodicals / popular science journals and ‘pseudoscience’ of the body
  • Reading the body – fiction immortalising the pseudoscientific
  • The attraction of the ‘pseudoscientific’ for C19 poets and novelists
  • Visual interpretations of the ‘pseudoscientific’

Please submit a 250 to 300 word abstract, together with a brief biography, by 31 January 2016 to p.beesley@ncl.ac.uk

Advertisements

What do you think? Share your thoughts below.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s